From 5aeeb5d856d12d9e7ffbec2c85adc5543abfd7cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lucky <66523959+l-ucky@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:47:12 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md

---
 README.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index bc1ff60..58f8383 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ There were no substantial differences that I noticed in the graphs, so retaining
 
 From the rvest::html_text website:
 
-There are two ways to retrieve text from a element: html_text() and html_text2(). html_text() is a thin wrapper around xml2::xml_text() which returns just the raw underlying text. html_text2() simulates how text looks in a browser, using an approach inspired by JavaScript's innerText(). Roughly speaking, it converts <br /> to "\n", adds blank lines around `<p>` tags, and lightly formats tabular data.
+>There are two ways to retrieve text from a element: html_text() and html_text2(). html_text() is a thin wrapper around xml2::xml_text() which returns just the raw underlying text. html_text2() simulates how text looks in a browser, using an approach inspired by JavaScript's innerText(). Roughly speaking, it converts <br /> to "\n", adds blank lines around `<p>` tags, and lightly formats tabular data.
 
-html_text2() is usually what you want, but it is much slower than html_text() so for simple applications where performance is important you may want to use html_text() instead.
+>html_text2() is usually what you want, but it is much slower than html_text() so for simple applications where performance is important you may want to use html_text() instead.
 
 # Calculating, and Displaying Post Frequency Differences