blue
/
4Chan-Web-Scraper-v2
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update README.md

This commit is contained in:
Lucky 2023-09-17 16:47:12 -03:00 committed by GitHub
parent ec17c8ca7b
commit 5aeeb5d856
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
README.md
View File

@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ There were no substantial differences that I noticed in the graphs, so retaining
From the rvest::html_text website:
There are two ways to retrieve text from a element: html_text() and html_text2(). html_text() is a thin wrapper around xml2::xml_text() which returns just the raw underlying text. html_text2() simulates how text looks in a browser, using an approach inspired by JavaScript's innerText(). Roughly speaking, it converts <br /> to "\n", adds blank lines around `<p>` tags, and lightly formats tabular data.
>There are two ways to retrieve text from a element: html_text() and html_text2(). html_text() is a thin wrapper around xml2::xml_text() which returns just the raw underlying text. html_text2() simulates how text looks in a browser, using an approach inspired by JavaScript's innerText(). Roughly speaking, it converts <br /> to "\n", adds blank lines around `<p>` tags, and lightly formats tabular data.
html_text2() is usually what you want, but it is much slower than html_text() so for simple applications where performance is important you may want to use html_text() instead.
>html_text2() is usually what you want, but it is much slower than html_text() so for simple applications where performance is important you may want to use html_text() instead.
# Calculating, and Displaying Post Frequency Differences